The
Simply Whitstable
Web Site

Week Commencing 24/3/07


The School that Time Forgot?

 

We already have quite a substantial school's section on our Days Gone By menu... but Jean Martin (Maidstone) really upset the tranquillity of those scribblings when her visitors book entry provided a heap of information about a school that we knew nothing about....  The Tankerton College in Park Avenue.

Following, Jean's initial message, further data arrived..... including a fascinating contribution from Peter Robbins (Dorset). We can now start to put it all together in an article that will eventually be added to our Schools menu.

The first draft is shown below and it summarises what we know to date. As you will see, I have had to chop the Visitors Book entries about a bit. I am sorry about that but it is necessary in order to fit the various contributions together and relate it all to the wider strory of education in Whitstable

  

Tankerton College Draft

  

It's amazing how our Visitors Book manages to throw up hitherto forgotten gems from the past. Just such a case cropped up on 18 March 2008 when Jean Martin related the story of Tankerton College.... a substantial school that served Whitstable from the end of the 19th century until the late 1930s. Jean was in an ideal position to provide the account as it was her ancestors that created the establishment and guided it through several decades.

Let's take a look....

 

Origins 1899-1912

  

As Jean recounts below, the school was the brainchild of her great grandfather back in 1899 and it became something of a family concern.....

  

To tell the story of Tankerton College, we need to start with my great grandfather, the Rev.William Osborne, (Born.1843, Halstead, Essex). 

He first served as a Baptist Minister at Gamlingay, Cambridgeshire in a church founded by John Bunyan. He went on to be appointed Minister at Eastbourne  at Ceylon Place (12yrs), then at Chatham at Clover Street and, in June 1898, came to Whitstable. He had three children - George Basil Osborne, Sidney Herbert Osborne and Maud Elise Osborne always known as Daisy

After qualifying as a teacher, George Osbourne taught at University School, Rochester and Bethany House School, Goudhurst.

About 1899 -1900, Rev W Osborne purchased the premises that would become Tankerton College. These were in Park Avenue, Tankerton. I think, today, the building is No.6, although it seems to be divided into apartments now. The school also included the building to the right of No.6. 

Number 6 housed the school rooms. The other building provided the teachers' accommodation. We always understood that he created the school to give all three of his children security of employment in the use of their skills and to serve his community (which he was passionate about) by filling a very necessary gap.

At first, Rev. Osborne was assisted by George in the conduct of the school but he sadly passed away soon after in 1900.

At the rear of the buildings were a playground and playing field. In fact on of my family photograph shows some 20 of the boys in the playground. The school was initially for boys but, at a later date, it DID accept girls. I stress this as I have heard that they only catered for boys but, as my grandmother Nellie Osborne (nee Collar) was also a teacher there, I have no reason to doubt her word. As to how many pupils or staff or classrooms there were, I cannot be exact. 

After the death of Rev. Osborne, George was assisted by Sidney and sister Maud in the management of the college, with George's wife Nellie as teacher/matron. At this time, the school advertised itself as a 'Boarding /Day School for Boys and it offered preparation for 'all examinations, civil service , College of Preceptors and Shorthand'.

George continued to study and, in 1912, gained his B.Sc - Licentiate of the College of Preceptors, London and it was now that the college changed it's description to 'A Boarding and Day School for sons of young gentlemen' and it had a Department for young ladies and a kindergarten. They also appointed Miss D Nathan as Principal.
 

Jean Martin

  

Before we continue with Jean's account, we need to take stock and consider some issues relating to the education system in general and Whitstable in particular.

With the early involvement of the Rev Osbourne, Tankerton College had a religious connection. This was not unusual. For centuries, there had been close ties between churches and schools. Two of our local grammar schools (Simon Langton Boys and Girls, Canterbury) trace their histories back 800 years to the time when Simon Langton was Archdeacon of Canterbury. Whitstable's oldest surviving school (The Endowed) was established in the 1840s... by the Church of England. Even when state education arrived with the construction of the present day Oxford Street Junior school in the 1870s, churches were anxious to grab control of the local school board. (For that particular fracas, see our history of Whitstable Junior school by clicking here). 

Of course, Tankerton College was markedly different in other respects. The schools mentioned above were primarily 'day schools' that provided general education for local people and received finance from other sources. By contrast, the college was private, catered for both day pupils and boarders, and targetted a catchment area way beyond the boundaries of Whitstable.

Another important difference was the clear attempt to slot the school into a specific niche and employ some early marketing techniques in a commercial world that was becoming ever more competitive. Small private schools were springing up across the country and, with the middle classes exercising their right of choice via a comfortable income, proprietors needed to 'differentiate' their 'product' in order to survive. This can be seen from the description.... 'Preparation for All Examinations, Civil Service , College of Preceptors and Shorthand'. The school may have been appealing to a wider geographical area but it was also narrowing its market to a particular section of the social structure... possibly the upper 'middle classes'. 

The school also reflected some key features of Edwardian society. Not only did parents decide the schooling of their offspring, they also had some say in the the career that they would pursue after education ceased. In this case, it was the Civil Service and 'College of Preceptors'. A 'preceptor' was a 'teacher, instructor or tutor'. Thus, the preparation of pupils for 'entry to a College of Preceptors' was the modern day equivalent of encouraging some pupils towards a Teacher Training College. 

Why did the school focus on pointing students at a career in teaching? Well, small schools inevitably reflected the personality, expertise, interests and passions of their owners. Here, we had an entire family that was involved in and passionate about education. So, is it any surprise that they were tempted to produce the next generation of teachers?     

The terminology also highlights quite a contrast between Edwardian education and modern times. The word 'precept' is a  'rule or commandment'. Education was something that Edwardian teachers taught whereas, nowadays, schools place greater emphasis on learners learning.

Finally, we need to ask why the Rev. William Osborne chose Tankerton for his school. At the moment, we don't know the full facts.... but we can guess at some of the advantages that Whitstable had to offer! The Victorians and Edwardians may not have been keen to remove their togs and plunge into the briny.... but they did recognise the merits of sea air over the smog of Britain's increasingly industrial cities. Where better to locate your children than one of the seaside towns closest to London? 

Apart from proximity to London, we should also remember that the town was just 30 miles from the significant navy base at Chatham where Royal Navy personnel, Royal Marines and Royal Engineers were stationed. People in the services would have spent time overseas and might well have been looking for a boarding school for their offspring. 

In 1899, Tankerton hardly existed as a residential area and Park Avenue would have been on the outskirts of the urban development. Property prices would have been relatively low compared with London. Furthermore, whilst road transport might have been poor, the area was served by the London-Thanet (North Kent Coast) railway line which had arrived in the 1860s. Of course, in 1899, the local railway station would not have been the modern day effort in Railway Avenue. In those days, pupils would have arrived at the old Whitstable station - located above the railway bridge in Oxford Street. 

  

Location

 

Park Avenue leads from Tankerton Road (next to the old Telephone Exchange) to Marine Parade where it emerges alongside the old Tankerton Hotel. The old school building lies on the west side of road. 

 

Above:  Park Avenue with the brick school building on the left and Tankerton Hotel on the right in the distance.
Below:  The front of the old school building on the left.

  

Jean Martin describes the playground and school field as being at the rear of the property. Thus, they would have been located between Park Avenue and The Castle grounds. 

 


The Tankerton College Site Plotted on an Aerial Photo by Peter Dalrymple

     

1909: School Life, Empire & Whitstable

  

Amazingly, Jean and her family have keepsakes that give us some clues as to what school life involved in those early days..... 

  

Amazingly, just this last weekend, my cousin Barry gave me a copy of a newspaper report  that his mother (Betty) had kept, presumably from her mother, Nellie. It was dated 1909 and reported on the college prize distribution. A quote from Councillor A.A.Kemp who was addressing the families and friends reads as follows :-

 

"The College was greatly appreciated by the people in Whitstable, and, as far as he could see, as the place grew, the school would be even more successful than now. 

By extending their accommodation, Mr.Osborne would be helping both the school and the district. It was to the boys that they were looking forward to maintain the supremacy of the country that they were all so proud of. 

He hoped they would have a successful year and that the boys would occupy successful positions in life."

 

Another section of the same article refers to the importance they attatched to 'Football'. Quote:

 

"Where could a boy learn endurance so well as in a good football match? What they desired was strength of body, strength of mind and strength of moral character?"

 

Jean Martin

  

We have talked about the the school's desire to attract boarders from other parts of the country. However, Jean's newspaper extracts suggest that the school also played quite a part in the education of local 'day pupils'. After all, why else would a local councillor be involved in the prize giving and why would he make such clear cut links with the local community?  

The newspaper extracts are also wonderful for telling us a bit about the era. For a moment, consider that remark... 'to maintain the supremacy of the country that they were all so proud of'. This was the 'Era of Empire' and 'King and Country'. It was a time when the national anthem was sung in schools and a Union flag might be draped across a wall or two! It was also a time when the civilian population had not become fully acquainted with the real horrors of war. That enlightenment would arrive a few years later at the Somme and Ypres..... and it would be reinforced in the early 1940s when civilians became targets.

It is also clear that Edwardians placed great emphasis on physical fitness and competitive sport. The idea that 'the battle of Waterloo was won on the playing fields of Eton' was still a popular concept... even if the quote was probably incorrectly attributed to the Duke of Wellington! Compare that with modern day attitudes which have led to the demise of sporting activity and sporting competition in many schools. 

 

Downsizing and Going Co-Ed in 1914

  

By 1914, boys and football weren't the only concerns of the school. The gentle touch had arrived at No 6 Park Avenue.... 

 

As I explained, the college started as a boys school and most of the information I hold refers to the college being for boys. Certainly, that was the case for the first 14 years. However, one of my collection of news items talks of the school becoming 'a more modest' establishment' in 1914 when girls were entered into the school. 

Maybe the onset of WWI was the main cause of the college changing to co-ed. However, I think it's worth bearing in mind that co-ed schools would not have been like those of today, and boys and girls would have been more segregated. 

Jean Martin

  

Whilst girls and boys were kept at a safe distance for much of the time, co-ed did allow for a more realistic school drama production in 1914.....

  

I had a copy of a Prize Giving List and 'Hiawatha School Play program (dated 1914) which have girls listed.

I can supply a few names in the hope that it might jolt a few people into asking relatives if their family had a connection. These are:

Helen Mason, I.Choppin, P.Amos, M.Flint, O.Humphreys, J.Down, P.R.Greenfields, G.B.Reeves, G.D.Duval, A.Goodayle, E.Warren, P.Barber, S.Harris, H.Banwell, L.Allen. R.Gosling, F.Suckling, Joan Etheridge, Frank Banwell.

Jean Martin

  

It was certainly a vast improvement on squaws called Bernard! 

It's time to reflect again and compare the situation with the developing state education system in Whitstable. The Oxford Street state school had started as a combined boys, girls and infants establishment in the 1870s - albeit with a fair bit of segregation. However, it soon became a wholly boys establishment. After infant level, government schools had very much become  'single sex' organisations by 1914.

Why, then, did Tankerton College move in the opposite direction - towards co-ed? We may never know the full reason but we can kick around some ideas. 

As a private establishment, the school's proprietors had different problems form those of a state school. They had to keep an eye on the balance sheets as well as the curriculum. Maybe, they were concerned about the future with a World War looming and a downturn in the economic situation forecast. Were they looking to diversify in a diminishing market? It may also be that they could see a time when male teachers were called to arms and the school might be left with a higher proportion of female teachers.   

   

An Old Boys Association?

  

It seems that friendships forged at the school were maintained after schooldays had ended....

  

From a newspaper report, I found the school formed an 'Old Boys' Society that met twice a year, at Whitsun and Christmas, and it seems they held a football match at the reunion. 

Jean Martin

 

The War Years: 1914-1920

  

Now, let's continue with Jean's account and consider the actual effects of World War I....  

  

In 1914, Sidney Osborne had had the call to be a missionary and left the college to attend Livingstone College in London to undertake 9 months medical training before being sent to Cholo, Nyasaland (now Malawi). At the moment, I am transcribing 10 years worth of his diary's but that is another story 

As I said, all three of Rev. Osborne's children had a part to play in the school and 'the diary' shows a particular concern for the welfare of their sister Maude. Sidney lived at 'Clovelly', Tankerton, which I think was also in Park Avenue [also at Amalfi, Tankerton]. When he left as a missionary, Maude remained in his house and it seems, in order to give her an income, they arranged that some of the boarders at the school should board with her at Clovelly. The diary also indicates that she had duties of matron at the school.

On 5th August 1914, war broke out and an explosion at the Faversham gun cotton factory struck fear into Whitstable. By Aug 14th, George enroled as a special constable, as many of the towns men did. Sidney enroled as a special by 18th August for 2 weeks before he left for Nyasaland. At that point, a Mr. Knapp of the London University was appointed in his place at the college. 

In 1915, my dear Auntie Betty was born at the College to Nellie and George.

Trenches were dug by the territorials on nearby Tankerton slopes, air ships were sighted moving up and down the coast and convoys of war ships were sighted in the estuary - all within a few days of war being declared.

This was the beginning of the end for the brothers at Tankerton College. By 1916, George had enlisted in the East Kent Regiment and left the school.

Sidney's diary suggests that the Osborne trio sold the school somewhere around 1918. 

Jean Martin

   

The 1920s, 1930s..... and Final Days?

  

The College carried on for some time after it was sold by the Osborne family but it may have come to its conclusion some time around 1939 or the early 1940s ..... as Jean explains

  

After World War I, the college continued with Miss Sussanah Bentley Stanton as Principal. (The name Sussanah Bentley crops up in our family tree more than once). 

A newspaper article says the school eventually became 'All Girls' and opereted on a much smaller scale. Although I have no proof as yet I think it is likely that World War II finished it off.

Jean Martin

  

1928: A School Report

  

I never cease to be amazed by the information that turns up via the Simply Whitstable Visitors Book. Within days of Jean's messages being published on the site, we received an email and a remarkable enclosure from Peter Robins in Dorset. Take a look at this....

  

  

Yes, it's the School Report of Peter's father, Arthur Robbins.... dated 5th April 1928!

Such reports can tell us a fair bit about a school and an era. This one confirms that the school continued to accept boys until at least the late 1920s. The signature at the foot of the document confirms that Sussanna Bentley Stanton remained in charge and the initials 'ECK' may suggest that Mr Knapp (who took over the duties of Sidney Osborne in 1914) taught at the school for more than a decade.

The reference to 'Next Term' is also fascinating as it gives us some insight into the school's  logistics. Pupils were advised to catch the "3.20 train from Victoria"! This tells us just how important the rail link was for the school and suggests that pupils were expected to arrive in a group. No doubt, they were met at Whitstable railway station but it could be that a member of staff actually supervised things at Victoria station in London.

The document also contains some wonderful wording. For example, exams were obviously pretty tough as they were described as 'terminal'!  Meanwhile, Arthur's conduct was described as 'careless of rules' - a somewhat ironic comment  as Peter tells me that his dad later 'joined the Ministry of Defence and spent half his working life writing rules'!  

Peter's grandfather (ie Arthur's father) had been RSM in the Royal Engineers at Chatham but had retired sometime in the early 20's and moved to East London. Peter does not know why Whitstable was chosen for his father's education.... unless the family discovered the college when they lived in Kent. It could easily be that the school impressed the Robins family during occasional day trips to the Kent coast. However, it might have been a bit more formal than that. For example, did the armed forces at Chatham have a list of schools in the area? Did the College include the Chatham military base in its marketing aims?

  

The School Badge...

 

Whilst we do not know much about the school uniform, Arthur Robin's school report allows us to discuss the school badge...

 

 

The Whitstable connection is established by the inclusion of the anchor. The school motto is the latin phrase "Tu ne Cede Malis".... which translates as "Yield not to misfortunes" or "Do Not Give In To Evil". The first of these interpretations is more in line with a school but the second could reflect the original religious connections with Rev. Osborne. However, we do not know whether the badge was introduced in the reign of the Osborne family or whether it was a later addition orchestrated by Sussanah B Stanton.

  

Comparing Notes...

 

Having traced the school through to the 1930s, we are now in a position to compare it with other similar establishments and see where it fits in.

There are quite strong similarities with another of our 'recently discovered' schools - the Kings Leigh of Northwood Road (click here for our King Leigh article). Both schools provided for board and day pupils.. and both targeted niche markets by offering to 'prepare' pupils for particular roles in the future. Tankerton College aimed at entrance examinations for the Civil Service and Teacher Training Colleges. The Kings Leigh prepared boys for Public School and/or the Royal Navy. In both cases, it seems likely that the schools' aims reflected the background and specific interests of their owners.

Of course, 'marketing, targeting and differentiating' schools stemmed from competition and the fact that the middle and upper classes had a choice. It may seem a bit strange to those of us who came through a mid-twentieth state education system. However, is it really that strange in the twenty first century? Don't some state schools now employ marketing managers and boast particular specialisms such as technology, sport, music etc. What has brought this about? Could it be that parental choice, league tables and competition now necessitate differentiation amidst a standard national curriculum? Increasingly, state schools seem to be operating like the private schools of the past. It's called progress!     

There were, of course, some differences between Tankerton College and the Kings Leigh. The Kings Leigh appears to have been a Prep School - accepting children up to the age of 11 whereas Tankerton College guided children through a full education. I also get the feeling that the Kings Leigh had fewer local pupils and probably played a less significant role in the community.  

We don't see too many similarities when we compare Tankerton College with another local private school - ie The Whitstable and Tankerton Collegiate School (The Tom Cat School) in Shaftesbury Road (click here to view our WTCS article). We believe that the WTCS operated from the 1930s and into the 1950s. However, we have found no evidence that it accepted anything other than day pupils and no evidence that it targetted niche markets. It seems to have provided a general education for local children. This partly explains why the WTCS is the best remembered of all Whitstable's local private schools while other establishments have been lost in the mists of time. Of course, another reason is that the WTCS is within the living memory of quite a few Natives!

  

The Osbornes....

   

So, what happened to the Osborne family? Well, let's take another look at the family tree....

 

 

... and let Jean Martin provide the final comment.....

  

George and Nellie Osborne 

George was wounded in the leg at the Battle of the Somme and, after recovery, was appointed Educational Officer at Salisbury Hospital. 

After the war, he went on to teach in Newmarket (Cambridgeshire). Whilst there in the mid-to-late 1920's, he and his wife, Nellie, organized school trips abroad for their pupils, mostly to Switzerland/Germany and Austria. This always struck me as pretty fantastic for that period of time!

Around 1943/44, they returned to Whitstable and George worked as a solicitors clerk at Elliot Allard and  moved into 'Corbiere', Thurston Park with Kate Collar and Fanny Daniels.

Sidney Osborne

Sidney remained in Africa where he died in 1942. 

However, while in Nyasaland, he wrote regular newslettersto his 'Old Boys' from his mission . It seems likely that these were probably sent to members of the school 'Old Boys' society.

Maude Osborne ('Daisy')

Daisy remained in Whitstable and, at some point in time, worked for the Misses Daniel and Collar.

 

Jean Martin

 

Although the Rev. William Osborne first came to Whitstable in 1898 and died just two years later, the Osborne family appear to have integrated quickly into the town's close knit community. Jean's accounts identify links between the Osbornes and well known local families including Daniels and Collar. Mind you, running a private school for the upper middle classes would inevitably have brought the proprietors into regular contact with the business community and upper echelons of society in a small town such as Whitstable. 

 

Next Steps....

 

The draft Tankerton College article is now open to comment and any further contributions. So.... it's now over to you! 

 

Sea Scouts Photo Poser....   

 

We need your help to solve a photo poser.... and it concerns this lovely shot supplied some time ago by Jock Harnett.....

 

 

It shows the Second Whitstable Sea Scouts at their strange headquarters - the railway station just south of the harbour gates on the Canterbury and District line. Most middle-aged Natives will recall that the unit occupied the building for much of the 1950s... but when did the scouts first take up occupancy and when did they move to their current HQ at Long Beach?

When we included the photo in our Sea Scout section (click here to view), we kept an open mind on these questions... but we were able to narrow things down a little. We knew that the railway line ceased to carry passengers in 1930.... which meant that the station might have been available pre-war. We also knew that the line closed to all traffic on  29 November 1952 and re-opened briefly in February 1953 to bring aid to the town in the aftermath of the great flood.

The anti tank traps (the concrete cones in the background) clearly showed that the photo was post-war and Jock recalled that steam trains chugged past the Sea Scouts HQ during his early days as a scout. Thus, we were able to state that the scouts were station residents prior to November 1952.... but we didn't know 'how long before'!

Recently, we included the photo in an article on Long Beach for our Chat Column of w/c 25/2/08 (click here to view). This time, we received responses that seemed to nail the whole issue. Let me summarise that data.....

 

  • John Harman felt that it was unlikely that the Sea Scouts occupied the station pre-war as, during the 1930s, they used a red hut at Long Beach close to their current day HQ. 
     

  • John's information led me to suggest that this older hut may have been demolished to make way for anti-invasion defences in 1939... leaving the scouts to find a new building in the late 1940s. It all seemed to fit!
     

  • Another piece of the jig saw seemingly fell into place thanks to Doug West's Portrait of a Seaside Town series of books. In his third volume (page 30), he featured a photo of the railway station - dated circa 1950. Doug's picture was clearly later than our shot as the heavy station canopy had been removed. Thus, our photo (with the canopy) seemed to fit into a time frame of 1945-1949. 
     

  • Finally, Terry Phillips appeared to have sown things up by referring to a little booklet entitled "Whitstable Harbour Memories" by Paul Tritton. This was published in 1997 by Robert Brett and Sons (sponsors of the Sea Scouts) and stated that the Sea Scouts disbanded during the war. It went on to suggest that the unit reformed in 1947 - setting up their base at the station before moving back to Long Beach in 1958.

   

Voila! All sorted! Well....not quite! I met Jock the other day and he gave me some extra thoughts.... and problems. Take a butchers at these points....

  

  • Two of the Sea Scouts' oldest 'old boys' have, quite independently, stated that the Sea Scouts moved to the station in.... 1951. If that is so, Doug West's 'circa 1950' photo (minus the canopy) may be a little more 'circa' than we originally thought. In fact, it could have been circa 1952. We know for certain that the station canopy had been removed by November 1952 as there are numerous photos of the 'last train' passing through an 'uncanopied' platform! Thus, our photo (with the canopy) may now slot into a later time frame of 1951-mid 1952.
     

  • Other doubts crop up with our photo. Another scout has recognised himself in the canopied photo and, as the unit had a minimum age limit of eleven, he could not have been a member of the Sea Scouts in the 1940s. Furthermore, the car in the background, (which belonged to Jock's dad), looks more "1950s" than "1940s".
     

  • There are also question marks over my suggestion that the Sea Scouts 'red hut' of the 1930s might have been demolished as part of the anti-invasion preparations. Jock has pointed out that the hut was a little closer to the harbour than the modern day HQ. As a result, it may have escaped demolition and the reason for the scouts relocating to the station may have been very different from my theory. Stories told to Jock in the past suggest that the red hut had very poor facilities. There was no electricity and meetings were held by gas light. It had no running water and the wet stuff had to be collected from a tap near the old lighthouse on the east quay. Thus, the move to the old station may have been prompted by the lure of modern services.

 

Where does that leave us? Well, we still have a date of 1958 for the Sea Scouts' evacuation of the old station. However, things are not tying together regarding the start of their station occupancy and the dating of our photo is very much in doubt.

I hate canopies!

 

Fun Ltd...

  

With summer approaching, Whitstable Natives will be considering ways of enjoying their beaches during 2008. Meanwhile, on the other side of the world Sue Pidford (new Zealand), has been wondering how to have fun and enjoy the beaches of 'rule bound' Santa Monica....

  

 

  

Mind you, the strict approach may have its advantages!

 

Comment on Santa Monica... and Whoops!

  

After publishing the above item, I received a correction note from Dave Warner in New Zealand...

 

Hi Dave,

I don't know where Sue got her picture from but New Zealand cannot lay claim to Santa Monica Beach. Close inspection shows the American spelling of "harbor", not our way at all. 

Nevertheless it wouldn't be a bad idea if the NZ councils adopted some of these rules. 

We are supposed to be approaching the end of our summer but the warm, sunny weather just keeps going on and on. Several areas of the country have been officially declared drought areas and some rain would be very welcome.

Cheers,

Dave Warner.

 

Thanks, Dave. I have removed the references to New Zealand. It was my fault! I wrongly assumed that it was a New Zealand!

  

Santa Monica Coincidence....

   

We now have a firm location for that Santa Monica sign..... thanks to this message from Bern

  

Re: Beach Sign in Santa Monica Photo 

Strange coincidence. I recognise that sign. I live in Santa Monica and Whitstable. Santa Monica is a beach town south of Malibu with a large British ex-pat community and a couple of pubs.

Bern
2/4/08

  

Thanks, Bern. Whitstable Natives tend to get everywhere and there have been quite a few 'coincidences' around the world. Perhaps, we ought to dedicate a permanent page to these stories. (PS I have replicated your message in the site visitors book to see if this will conjure up some stories)

  

Comments...

      

Can you supply more information?

If you want to comment on any item on this page, please ...

 click here

We will  insert your views immediately below the relevant article. 

    


 The Simply Whitstable Web Site